Wednesday, September 28, 2011

Hydroponics Could Feed the World

When you hear the word hydroponics, what immediately comes to mind? Most likely you imagine a college kid's closet filled with lamps and marijuana plants. That is what I picture too. However, while working at an organic food store, I started seeing tomatoes labelled as being hydroponically grown. This got me wondering about the growing method - first used as far back as the 1930's - and how it could be beneficial to our society. 


Essentially hydroponics means "the process of growing plants in sand, gravel, or liquid, with added nutrients but without soil". This means that seedlings are placed in some medium (cloth, gravel, etc.) and grown indoors under LED lamps. The plants are fed fertilizers and nutrients along with water through a pumping system that recycles the water to prevent waste. 


This is a very sterile and controlled method of growing plants, and is self-contained, therefore requiring minimal effort on the farmer's part to keep the plants alive and healthy. In addition, these plants can be placed much closer together than in the field, resulting in a greater yield. There are also no pesticides, no weeds, and no pesky insects since the LED lights can be set to a frequency that discourages insect breeding. 


Here are the benefits to hydroponic farming:

  • No soil
  • Little assistance needed from farmers after everything is set up
  • Can be done inside abandoned buildings
  • Saves on water by recycling it
  • No pesticides
  • Organic
  • Can be run using alternative energy sources, such as wind or solar power
  • Large, uniform crop yields
  • Great variety of fruits and veggies can be grown
  • Not affected by seasons
  • Relatively inexpensive
  • Uses CO2 to promote photosynthesis (less CO2 and more oxygen in our atmosphere)
  • Safe from bacteria such as E Coli and Listeria --> Remember when spinach was recalled due to contamination? It was due to the fact that sewage leaked into the soil in the farm fields...no soil, no issue! 

Several companies world wide are experimenting with this method of farming, including one in Ithaca New York called AeroFarms. This start-up seeks to transform abandoned buildings into "vertical farms". 


So, a building like this


could easily be turned into something like this



Helping to feed our growing populations while simultaneously eliminating factory farming, a practice which is killing our environment as well as human beings. 




Sources:
http://innoplex.org/eng/2010/12/aerofarms/ 
http://www.farmsanctuary.org/issues/factoryfarming/
http://www.epicurious.com/tools/fooddictionary/entry/?id=3006

Friday, September 23, 2011

The Fate of Humanity

The new documentary 2012: Time For Change discusses modern society and it's lack of connection to the natural world. I stumbled on this documentary yesterday while looking through Netflix. This is now one of my favorite documentaries!




The gods first created people out of mud, but they were not well beings; they lacked emotions and insight. They were then destroyed by a great storm. Next the gods made people out of wood, but they had no direction. They were destroyed by a great flood. Finally the gods made people out of corn. They had great insight, balance, and were powerful, so the gods blew a mist over their eyes. They slowly moved away from the natural world, and so we are today. The end of this era is coming. We need to evolve our consciousness to reconnect with the natural world. The age of wisdom is coming, and we must change in order to continue our survival on earth. 


Our consumer culture is a "materialist prison" (Daniel Pinchbeck). We're running out of resources, and we are ruining the earth. We must change our consciousness and actions. Can we escape this routine of destruction that is our way of living? Why does congress refuse to fund alternative energy or fund the creation of bike trails and better sidewalks for pedestrians? Are these politicians all in the pocket of big businesses such as oil and agriculture? We need to free ourselves! 


We had a lack of elders to lead the new movement for change in the 1960's. Now these once-children are the elders we need to lead us out of the dark and into the new era. If we can all change our consciousness and our actions, with the guidance of elders, we can become more spiritual and save our earth and existence. 


Armageddon really means transformation. This does not need to be the end of time, or the demise of humanity, but ti does need to be a time of change. We cannot continue living this way, or this will become a time of destruction and death. 


If people are constantly being reminded of the dire situation our society is in, and the doom we're facing now, why are they not mobilized to do something about it and affect change? This is because people cannot really grasp what they are being told. It's a tough thing to accept emotionally. Also, change is difficult for everyone, even small change. We are programmed to resist change. Not to mention the fact that we're effectively controlled by the system (in a way similar to the Matrix), where capitalism has us and we do not want to escape. We cannot even fathom living differently, and our politicians continually tell us that resistance is futile and nothing will ever change, so just relax and go with it. 


According to Einstein, we cannot fix the problems by using the same mindset we used to create them, instead we must change our way of thinking. 

Alex Grey painting of Pres. Obama

Thursday, September 15, 2011

Analysis of Candidates: Stewart Alexander

Now we look at...
Stewart Alexander

Stewart Alexander is a Democratic Socialist politician who is running for president of the US. Formerly a member of the Air Force Reserve, Alexander is a fine example of the self-made man. He paid for his college education through hard work, eventually becoming a well-known politician who ran for for Mayor of California, Lieutenant Governor of California, and for Vice President in 2008. Each campaign was highly unsuccessful. Alexander currently resides in Virginia and works closely with the Socialist Party.


Alexander's campaign webpage lists his stance on many important issues of our time:


"The Socialist Party stands for the abolition of every form of domination and exploitation, whether based on social class, gender, race/ethnicity, age, education, sexual orientation, or other characteristics.

We are committed to the transformation of capitalism through the creation of a democratic socialist society based on compassion, empathy, and respect as well as the development of new social structures.  Socialism will establish a new social and economic order in which workers and community members will take responsibility for and control of their interpersonal relationships, their neighborhoods, their local government, and the production and distribution of all goods and services.

For these reasons we call for social ownership and democratic control of productive resources, for a guarantee to all of the right to participate in societal production, and to a fair share of society's product, in accordance with individual needs.

As we pursue a socialist transformation of society, we join with others in making radical demands on the existing system: demands that challenge the basic assumptions of a capitalist market economy while pointing the way to a new society. Although reforms will not in themselves bring about socialism, the fight for them will advance the cause by demonstrating the inherent limitations and injustice of the capitalist system. As we build the socialist movement, we organize around a platform committed to our common and interdependent struggles and aspirations."


"We stand in total opposition to U.S. imperialism and the current “war on terror”."


"focusing on production for need not profit"


"municipal ownership and control of energy plants, in a non-profit and decentralized, but coordinated, system that ensures the most careful use of natural resources."



http://vote-socialist.org/p08/questionnaires/alexander.html 



http://www.stewartalexandercares.com/

Friday, September 2, 2011

Analysis of Candidates: Roger Gary

Now we take a look at...
Roger Gary


Roger Gary is a Libertarian activist from the state of Texas. Formerly an elected official in San Antonio, he also is a lifetime member of the Texas Libertarian Party. 


You might be asking yourself (as I was wondering), what is a Libertarian? What do they stand for? In a nutshell, freedom. The dictionary defines a Libertarian as:  



noun
1.
a person who advocates liberty especially with regard to thought or conduct.
2.
a person who maintains the doctrine of free will.



Therefore, a Libertarian believes that people should be free to do as they see fit, without government interference. This is essentially the basis of the Republican Party's ideals - from which the party has recently strayed; less government, smaller government, freer citizens.


Personally, I love the idea of less government interference. However, there comes a time when the government does need to step in and push the people toward more rational decisions, such as getting the economy back on track. I think we all would agree that people often do not want to do what is best for them in the long-term (like exercising!), and sometimes the citizens with more experience need to step in and show everyone what the best choice is.  


On his campaign website, Gary spares no harsh words when describing his fellow Texan, Rick Perry, saying that Perry is "all hat and no cattle". Gary also states that the Republican nominees are not courageous enough to give Americans the freedom they deserve; they are too soft to get the job done. 


As for his position on various issues, I'll let Gary's own campaign website speak for itself.


Civil Liberties

Abortion- Government should not make your medical decisions for you — but neither should it force you to subsidize someone else’s abortion.
Gay Marriage-Marriage should be a contact between individuals, not a stamp of approval from the government. As with other issues, the solution is not more government, but less.
Gun Rights-There is a natural, inherent Right to keep and bear arms, protected not only by the 2nd Amendment, but also by the 9th and 10th (and arguably the 4th). This Right is also a practical necessity: Americans must be able to protect themselves against violence by criminals, including terrorists, as well as would-be tyrants (whether foreign or domestic).
Patriot Act-Under both the Bush and Obama administrations, the federal government has frequently trampled on the Rights of the American citizens under the guise of protecting Americans from terrorism. We must stop molesting people at the airport, listening in on your private phone conversations, and reading your library check-out records, and start protecting Americans from actual terrorism. Roger Gary will respect the 4th and 10th Amendments.


Economics

Bailouts- As with virtually every interference by government (at whatever level), the bailouts benefited Big Business at the expense of smaller companies, Labor, consumers, and the taxpayer. Roger Gary opposes corporate welfare.
Business- Government should not become “smotherment” by creating unnecessary red tape and bureaucracy. “Smotherment” benefits the huge corporations which can afford the additional expense created by such polices, forcing smaller businesses out of the marketplace. This drives prices up by reducing the competition for our business, and drives wages down by reducing the competition for our labor.
National Debt-The Federal debt is quickly spiraling out of control and the time we have remaining to do something about it is running short. Unlike the Obama and Bush administrations and the Democrats and Republicans in Congress we need to actually start cutting government, balance the budget, and start paying down the national debt and unfunded liabilities. If we keep adding to the debt, eventually the interest alone will overwhelm the Federal budget. That would require one or more of these options: (1) Raising taxes, which would further damage the private sector; (2) Sale of Federal goods or lands [and an attempt to sell a significant amount of land would drive the price lower, negating the effort]; (3) Further borrowing, which would raise interest rates and damage the private sector; or (4) Printing enough currency to cover the shortfall, thus producing absolutely ruinous inflation.
Retirement-Americans should be encouraged to take their hard earned money and place it in deferred tax accounts such as IRA’s and 401k plans instead of being forced to pay 6.2% of their money into the failed Social Security administration which is on the verge of collapse.
Taxes-The government must cut waste, fraud, and abuse; more importantly, it must end its activities not sanctioned by the U. S. Constitution. This would allow Congress to immediately begin to lower taxes for all Americans.

Education

The best way to educate children is to allow each state to use the food stamps model. Most state governments have decided that food stamps are a public benefit that the state should provide while you may agree or disagree with this notion, you should agree that the state governments allowing food stamp recipients to shop at private sector grocery stores is a much better solution than having the government actually take over the distribution of the food.
Education is similar. Parents should be allowed to open enroll their child into the school of their choice. The market effects of competition will drive down cost while increasing quality meaning everyone wins.

Health Care

It is truly amazing that diseases that would have killed a person just a few decades ago can be cured or prevented with little problem today. While our life expectancy and quality of health care has increased exponentially, the costs have also caused some to become concerned. The problem of rising health care costs is best solved by reducing cost transfers, opening up the market to competition, removing government red tape which drives up costs, and a focus on health savings accounts to help offset the costs.

National Security

Roger Gary believes in a strong national defense as defined in our United States Constitution, as opposed to an international offence.
Afghanistan-After a decade of American intervention, Roger supports a transition allowing the people of Afghanistan to take control over their own government and their own security.
Iraq-Roger believes in removing our forces from the country.
Libya-American government aid has brought us violent dictators such as Saddam Hussein and oppressive theocratic governments such as the Taliban. Roger Gary believes that by using American forces in Libya we run a much greater risk of terrorism. Additionally, he understands that the cost of American lives intervening in a fight that is not ours is too great of a risk to take.

http://rvgary2012.com/


When it comes to Roger Gary, the only question we can really ask ourselves as voters is: do we really want this much freedom? With ultimate freedom, especially for the issue of education, income determines who gets the best schools and who doesn't. Is that fair? Should we allow low income children to suffer poor education just because we, as adults, demand complete freedom of choice?